Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Destanee Aiava vs Tamira Paszek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Aiava vs Paszek analysis and find out who is favored!
Destanee Aiava vs Tamira Paszek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Aiava 1 - 0 Paszek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Aiava has won 49.28% of points on their second serve, while Paszek has won 45.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Aiava, in recent form, has won 54.35% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paszek has won 59.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.26% and 44.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Aiava has saved 56.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paszek has saved 53.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Aiava has won 67.09% of matches played (W/L 53/ 26), with Paszek winning 65.71% (W/L 46/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Aiava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 46/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Paszek has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 56/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 49/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Aiava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.92% of matches (W/L 51/ 23), where as Paszek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.41% of matches (W/L 38/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Aiava winning 1 times and Paszek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Aiava winning 2 and Paszek winning 0. The last match between Aiava and Paszek was at the W25 Foxhills, 03-08-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Destanee Aiava getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Aiava and Paszek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Aiava winning 0 times and Paszek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Aiava winning 0, and Paszek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Aiava has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.66 while Paszek has played against players with an average rank of 318.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Aiava has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paszek has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Aiava has converted 49.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paszek has converted 52.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
186
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
299
Rank
26
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
60% (222-145)
Career Total W/L
57% (396-300)
57% (17-13)
YTD W/L
69% (22-10)
$127,649
Career Prize Money
$1,345,638
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Destanee Aiava | Tamira Paszek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (29/44) | 66% (25/38) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (22/29) | 56% (14/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 73% (11/15) | 31% (4/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (20/38) | 25% (11/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Destanee Aiava
Player
Tamira Paszek
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Destanee Aiava | Tamira Paszek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (17/13) | 69% (22/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (38/30) | 66% (46/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (331/303) | 56% (369/286) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 62% (16/10) | 74% (17/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 71% (5/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 72 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 70 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:23 | 1:38:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 219.67 | 288.34 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1326/2087) | 71% (1377/1953) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (842/1326) | 59% (812/1377) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (375/761) | 45% (262/576) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (107/217) | 52% (151/288) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (849/1978) | 50% (986/1978) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (15/10) | 65% (15/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (17/30) | 69% (22/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 95% (21/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 5% (21/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 18% (11/2) |
Destanee Aiava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ankita Raina
Player
Destanee Aiava
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Evialina Laskevich
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
78%
(
29 of
37)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Maria Mateas
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Destanee Aiava
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina Maria Bara
Player
Destanee Aiava
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Destanee Aiava
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Destanee Aiava
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Haruka Kaji
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Yuki Naito
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamira Paszek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Tamira Paszek
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve %
53%
(
17 of
32)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Hikaru Sato
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
112)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Maria Martinez Vaquero
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Tamira Paszek
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Hannah Klugman
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
52%
(
29 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Klaudija Bubelyte
Player
Tamira Paszek
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
65 of
89)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
53%
(
47 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
53 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Sophie Drakeford-Lewis
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
0%
(
0 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Aiava Vs Paszek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
